建筑师声明了再生设计手册

建筑师声明是一项全球运动，它在英国开始。当它于2019年开始时，它包括在既定目标中都将“在我们的工作室中采用更多的再生设计原理，以设计建筑和城市主义超出了使用的净零碳的标准。”

及时参加了2021年联合国气候变化会议（COP26） - 现在在苏格兰格拉斯哥 -已经发布了非凡的实践指南有两个主要部分：第1部分，有关如何运行建筑实践的指南，以及更普遍的兴趣；第2部分，项目设计指南。但是在此之前，它始于概述该行业及其碳足迹的重要性。

“As the earth’s life support systems come under increasing threat, we also know that construction is responsible for over 40% of global CO2 emissions, (see Fig. 1) yet the scale and intensity of urban development, infrastructure and building construction globally continues to expand, resulting in greater greenhouse gas generation and loss of habitat each year. Current ways of regulating building performance and construction have not achieved significant reductions in carbon emissions from buildings. "

“For everyone working in construction and the built environment sector, meeting the needs of our societies within the earth’s ecological boundaries will demand a paradigm shift in practice. If we are to reduce and eventually reverse the environmental damage we are causing, we will need to re-imagine our buildings, cities and infrastructures as indivisible components of a larger, constantly regenerating, and self-sustaining system."

我要发表的第一个评论是，它通过说只有40％的人来低估“建筑环境部门”的影响。beplay体育官网电脑绝大多数运输是对建筑环境做出的选择的直接结果，其排放来自建筑物之间的汽车。beplay体育官网电脑行业排放量并不比例并不是由制造汽车和进入运输基础设施的材料。“建筑环境部门”的真正足迹可能接近75％的排放，我们不应该让计划者beplay体育官网电脑和工程师在这里容易。他们还列出了一些“杀手事实”，不要提到钢它的影响与混凝土一样大。

建筑师声明（AD）指导小组指出该行业还不够。

“30 years of conventional design accompanied by limited levels of ‘sustainable’ design have not got us even remotely near where we need to be. Indeed, the very term ‘sustainable’ has been hijacked and overused resulting in the continuation of business as usual...Current goals/economics are based on infinite growth, linear resource use, and a view of nature as something to be plundered, it is this kind of thinking that has led to the emergency we find ourselves in. We need to move on from the current paradigm of merely targeting Sustainable design, which often simply mitigates negatives, into the realm of Regenerative design which strives for a net positive impact of our projects."

这是一个重要的一点，这并不是什么新鲜事物。不列颠哥伦比亚大学可持续性互动研究中心（CIRS）的约翰·罗宾逊教授几年前说，值得重复：

“We can no longer afford the current practices of pursuing goals that simply reduce environmental impacts, nor can we continue to simply avoid reaching the theoretical limits of ecosystems’ carrying capacity. This practice is insufficient as a driving force for the required changes. This approach of reduction and curtailment has proven ineffectual as it is not motivational and does not, in principle, extend beyond the logical end-point of net zero impact. We need to inspire people to work to restore and regenerate the biosphere, sequester billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere every year and seek out significantly more efficient uses of resources, especially non-renewables."

正如我们之前指出的，再生设计很难。我在2019年的一篇文章中写道：“您必须使用经过精心收获和重新种植的可再生材料建造（这就是为什么我们爱木材）。我们必须停止使用化石燃料来加热和冷却并搭配它们，我们必须停止，我们必须停止浪费水，我们必须像疯狂的那样种植，以制造更多的木头并吸收更多的二氧化碳。”

这就是为什么文档如此重要的原因。它以更高的再生设计解释开始。摇篮的建筑师兼合着者曾将可持续性设计描述为“ 100％糟糕”。他还几年前开玩笑关于可持续性一词的无聊和无意义，说：“谁只想简单地'可持续'婚姻？人类肯定可以渴望更多。”这无疑是Architects声明的渴望：

“我们迫切需要转向新的范式，而且我们中的许多人都辩论了什么是可持续性的最终目标，现在是时候问自己如何在再生设计中表现出色。much more than ‘sustainability with all the bolts tightened up’—it requires some fundamentally different starting points."

然后，该文档详细介绍了：

• 能量，全活碳和圆形
• 体现碳
• 循环和浪费
• 改造
• 材料
• 运营能量和碳
• 低能服务和可再生能源

然后是关于生态，生物多样性，水，气候正义，社区，健康，韧性的部分。它涵盖了一切 - 在我让大学将课程标题更改为再生设计之后，我很可能会用它作为我的可持续设计讲座的教科书。这是一个了不起的文件，以附录，页面长时间结束，并带有宝贵的链接和出色的资源，我经常指出。并从结论中鼓舞人心：

“The next decade will be critical for safeguarding life on our planet and establishing resilient communities where humanity can thrive. As architects, we can be at the forefront of that work, as we shape people’s lives through the places they live, work and play."

架构的问题在于它需要这么长时间。什么时候今年的斯特林奖得主受到批评由于不特别可持续，回应是“嘿，我们从2013年开始。”这就是为什么建筑师，规划师，工程师和监管机构必须停止谈论未来十年，并立即开始处理这些问题的原因。建筑师声明刚刚交付了该计划。

在此处下载练习指南。